On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 04:17:36PM -0600, Jeffrey Law wrote:
> One more note.  I've got a standard setup that allows me to test that the
> c6x code generator isn't aborting, segfaulting and the like.  It can't test
> the correctness of the generated code as there's not gdbsim or qemu port for
> c6x.   But it's better than nothing.  So if you've got something you want
> tested, pass it along as a patch and I can throw it in.

Hello,

I'm starting work on this again, and I'd like to know your testing
procedure, if it's not too complicated to communicate, so I can reproduce
those issues and fix them. I assume many of those are fixed by the last
two patches on the branch, but I'd like to know if there's more, and
maybe fix that too.

Thanks.

-- 
Richard Braun

Reply via email to