On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 18:42 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > This hook is never called with an invalid address. > > Since VOIDmode MEMs aren't valid, I think that should mean it's invalid > to call this hook (and rtlanal.c:address_cost) with VOIDmode. I never > got time to look at that though. (The culprit in the case I saw was > tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c. Sandra had some improvements in this area, > so maybe they would fix this too.)
Yes, the test case I put in PR 54619 also shows us getting there from tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c with VOIDmode. I will look a bit more at this when I get a chance. Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com
