On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:51:56PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Which passes testing now.
> >
> > Ok?
>
> Yes. Probably we'll need to retune parallel checking, but we probably need
> to do it anyway already now, e.g. i386.exp grew too much.
Committed.
Eventually we can shave off some time by removing any of the -O3
options:
set C_TORTURE_OPTIONS [list \
{ -O0 } \
{ -O1 } \
{ -O2 } \
{ -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer } \
{ -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops } \
{ -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions }
\
{ -O3 -g } \
{ -Os } \
{ -Og -g } ]
-O3 and -Os already enable -finline-functions for example, likewise
-fomit-frame-pointer is enabled on most targets. For testing coverage
-funroll-all-loops should trump -funroll-loops, and rather than
disabling frame-pointers I'd explicitely enable them. Thus keep
-O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-O3 -funroll-all-loops
-O3 -g
(not sure why we have -g at -O3 but not at -O[012s] where it should
be more common ...)
Richard.
