Am Donnerstag, 2. April 2026, 17:28:28 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb
Jason Merrill:
> > diff --git a/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc b/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc
> > index 4a6f5b4800c..75241f23bb1 100644
> > --- a/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc
> > @@ -4116,6 +4116,10 @@ static bool
> >
> > struct_or_union_with_inheritance_p (tree struc)
> > {
> >
> > tree iter = TYPE_FIELDS (struc);
> >
> > +
> > + while (iter && TREE_CODE (iter) == TYPE_DECL)
>
> I still think this should be != FIELD_DECL, rather than == TYPE_DECL.
As i didn't want to change the behaviour and refactor to fit the new TYPE_DECL
ordering in a single commit, I implemented your recommendation in 3/3 [1] to
keep the history clean.> Unfortunately it's not suitable for GCC 16 at this point since this > isn't a regression and the change affects non-experimental code. I expected as much. As this was an alternative to "[PATCH v2] c++/reflection: class_member_of/modules ordering fix" [2] i just want to bring up the other patch again. While I personally don't think we should change the module streaming interface just for GCC 16 if this will land in 17, i would love to close this task in my mind to. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2026-March/710890.html [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2026-March/710607.html Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
