This is v2 of
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2026-March/711809.html, fixed
and enhanced as was suggested by Philipp.

This patch adds missing simplifications for (op (and/ior x C1) C2) in
special cases.  In the AND case, when (and C1 C2) is not equal to C1,
some bits set in C2 are not set in C1, and thus (eq (and x C1) C2) can
never be true.  The OR case is similar when (and C1 C2) is not equal to
C2.  As we know that the result of (and x C1) cannot be greater than C1,
and that that of (or x C1) cannot be less than C1 for unsigned integers,
LTU, LEU, GTU, GEU cases can be optimized, too.

The patch is meant to fix an ICE on RISC-V.  In a former patch, I tried
to change the insn condition directly, but Jeff pointed out that it was
more reasonable to optimize it out before the split.  As was suggested
by Jeff, this patch tries to simplify the expression in
simplify_relational_operation_1.

The URL for the former patch:
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/[email protected]/

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * simplify-rtx.cc (simplify_context::simplify_relational_operation_1):
Add simplifications for (op (and/ior x C1) C2) in special cases.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/riscv/zbs-if_then_else-02.c: New test.
---
 gcc/simplify-rtx.cc                           | 30 +++++++++++++++++
 .../gcc.target/riscv/zbs-if_then_else-02.c    | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbs-if_then_else-02.c

diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
index 50fc51152ca..abaee2423a7 100644
--- a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
+++ b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
@@ -6731,6 +6731,36 @@ simplify_context::simplify_relational_operation_1 
(rtx_code code,
        }
     }
 
+  /* Several optimizable scenerios of (op (and/ior x C1) C2) */
+  if ((op0code == AND || op0code == IOR)
+      && CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (op1)
+      && CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (XEXP (op0, 1)))
+    {
+      unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT c1 = UINTVAL (XEXP (op0, 1));
+      unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT c2 = UINTVAL (op1);
+
+      if ((op0code == AND
+          && ((code == EQ && (c1 & c2) != c2)
+              || (code == GEU && c1 < c2)
+              || (code == GTU && c1 <= c2)))
+         || ((op0code == IOR
+             && ((code == EQ && (c1 & c2) != c1)
+                 || (code == LEU && c1 > c2)
+                 || (code == LTU && c1 >= c2)))))
+       return const0_rtx;
+
+
+      if ((op0code == AND
+          && ((code == NE && (c1 & c2) != c2)
+              || (code == LTU && c1 < c2)
+              || (code == LEU && c1 <= c2)))
+         || ((op0code == IOR
+             && ((code == NE && (c1 & c2) != c1)
+                 || (code == GTU && c1 > c2)
+                 || (code == GEU && c1 >= c2)))))
+       return const_true_rtx;
+    }
+
   /* (eq/ne (bswap x) C1) simplifies to (eq/ne x C2) with C2 swapped.  */
   if ((code == EQ || code == NE)
       && GET_CODE (op0) == BSWAP
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbs-if_then_else-02.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbs-if_then_else-02.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3393bea8898
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbs-if_then_else-02.c
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/* { dg-do link  { target { rv64 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zbb_zbs -mabi=lp64d -flto" } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-Og" "-O1" } } */
+
+struct S {
+  int a;
+  char b;
+  int c;
+} s;
+
+const signed char c = -37;
+int d;
+struct S v1[] = {{0, 8}, 0, 0, -108976}, v2[] = {{}, 0, 0, 2804};
+int a;
+struct S v3[3];
+int *p = &a;
+
+void foo() {
+  int a;
+  if (a)
+    ;
+  else if (v1[0].b)
+    s.a = 0;
+  else
+    d = 0;
+  if (*p)
+    if (v3[1].c)
+      if (1 ^ (d & c & v2[1].c & ~v1[1].c | s.a))
+        v3[2].c = 0;
+}
+
+int main() { foo(); }
-- 
2.46.0

Reply via email to