Richard Biener <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 4:28 PM Jeffrey Law > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3/23/2026 9:53 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: >> > On Tue, 3 Mar 2026, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 4:09?AM Richard Sandiford >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> OK to install? I've reattached the patch just in case. >> >> Ok. >> > Do I get this right: *Richard Sandiford* needs to ask for ok on >> > *rtl-ssa*? >> Technically yes, and largely my fault I believe. I know Richi and I >> touched on the topic a while back and I was going to bring it to the >> steering committee. But I can't remember if I ever did that. With >> Richard S. retiring it's largely moot. > > Why should it be moot? I suppose it's entirely up to Richard S. to > accept or decline any offered role.
FWIW, I don't mind either way. I can review other people's work under global reviewership. If people are happy reviewing my rtl-ssa stuff, then IMO it's better to keep the status quo, since peer review is good :) But if people would prefer not to have "unmaintained" parts of the code base and want there to be at least one rtl-ssa maintainer, then I wouldn't mind being one. Thanks, Richard
