On 09/13/2012 10:42 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > Can we introduce additional "*fmai_fmadd_<mode>_1" pattern (and > others) that would cover missing 231 alternative?
I really don't think that's necessary. For that you'd need to be computing fma(x, y, x), at which point vfmadd213 matches as well. r~
