On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 09:52:32AM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I found this a bit hard to parse. Maybe:

Thanks, here is an updated version of the patch.

diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-16/porting_to.html b/htdocs/gcc-16/porting_to.html
index 3bd1ff2b..74a5bf34 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-16/porting_to.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-16/porting_to.html
@@ -31,9 +31,49 @@ and provide solutions. Let us know if you have suggestions 
for improvements!
 <!-- introduced in 0eac9cfee8cb0b21de866a04d5d59685ab35208f -->
 
 <p>
-Since GCC 16, <code>-Wunused-but-set-*</code> warning options no longer
-consider preincrements and postincrements as uses, which may lead to
-compilation failures when using <code>-Werror</code>.
+Since GCC 16, <code>-Wunused-but-set-*</code> warning options have been
+extended to have multiple levels controlling what kinds of uses disable
+the warnings for variables which are otherwise unused.  Older versions of GCC
+only implemented what has become <code>-Wunused-but-set-variable=1</code>
+or <code>-Wunused-but-set-parameter=1</code>, while the new default
+for <code>-Wunused-but-set-variable</code> or
+<code>-Wunused-but-set-parameter</code> is <code>=3</code> (the new defaults
+are also used when these warnings are enabled by
+<code>-Wall</code> or <code>-Wextra</code>, respectively).
+<code>=2</code> ignores pre/post inc/decrements on the variable,
+<code>=3</code> also ignores compound assignments if the <em>LHS</em> variable
+is not also used on the <em>RHS</em>.
+<pre><code>
+void foo (void) {
+  int a = 1; // -Wunused-variable warning
+  int b = 0; // Warning for -Wunused-but-set-variable=<i>n</i> <i>n</i> &gt;= 1
+  b = 1; b = 2;
+  int c = 0; // Warning for -Wunused-but-set-variable=<i>n</i> <i>n</i> &gt;= 2
+  ++c; c--; --c; c++;
+  int d = 0; // Warning for -Wunused-but-set-variable=<i>n</i> <i>n</i> &gt;= 3
+  d += 4;
+  int e = 0; // No warning, cast to void
+  (void) e;
+  int f = 0; // No warning, f used
+  int g = f = 5;
+  (void) g;
+  int h = 0; // No warning, preincrement used
+  int i = ++h;
+  (void) i;
+  int j = 0; // No warning, postdecrement used
+  int k = j--;
+  (void) k;
+  int l = 0; // No warning, l used
+  int m = l |= 2;
+  (void) m;
+}
+</code></pre>
+In order to avoid the warnings, one can either remove newly diagnosed
+variables or parameters which aren't used except in pre/post inc/decrements
+or compound assignments, make them used in some way, e.g. just
+casting to <code>(void)</code>, or lowering the level of the warning.  See
+<a 
href=https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wunused-but-set-variable_003d";
+<code>-Wunused-but-set-*</code></a> documentation for more details.
 </p>
 
 </body>


        Jakub

Reply via email to