This fixes up a missed optimization regression for riscv in ifcvt after 
r16-6350-g9e61a171244110.
The problem is noce_emit_cmove will fail for QImode. This can show up when 
dealing with shifts
and the right hand side is `(subreg:QI (reg:DI) lowpart)`. Trying first for the 
subreg mode
fails so the need to try to unwrap the subreg and try for the full mode.

This fixes test_ShiftLeft_eqz in gcc.target/riscv/zicond_ifcvt_opt.c.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.

        PR rtl-optimization/123308
gcc/ChangeLog:

        * ifcvt.cc (noce_try_cond_zero_arith): If noce_emit_cmove fails
        for a lowpart subreg case, then try the full reg cmove and
        take the lowpart subreg afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <[email protected]>
---
 gcc/ifcvt.cc | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/ifcvt.cc b/gcc/ifcvt.cc
index 75d959f652c..9d62681be24 100644
--- a/gcc/ifcvt.cc
+++ b/gcc/ifcvt.cc
@@ -3202,6 +3202,28 @@ noce_try_cond_zero_arith (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
                            XEXP (if_info->cond, 0), XEXP (if_info->cond, 1),
                            op != AND ? XEXP (a, 1) : const0_rtx,
                            op != AND ? const0_rtx : XEXP (a, 0));
+  if (!target)
+    {
+      end_sequence ();
+      rtx tmp = XEXP (a, op != AND);
+      /* If the cmove fails and this was a lowpart subreg,
+        then try the reg part and then putting back the lowpart
+        afterwards.  */
+      if (GET_CODE (tmp) != SUBREG  || !subreg_lowpart_p (tmp))
+       return false;
+      start_sequence ();
+
+      tmp = SUBREG_REG (tmp);
+      target = gen_reg_rtx (GET_MODE (tmp));
+      target = noce_emit_cmove (if_info, target, GET_CODE (cond),
+                               XEXP (cond, 0), XEXP (cond, 1),
+                               op != AND ? tmp : const0_rtx,
+                               op != AND ? const0_rtx : tmp);
+      if (!target)
+       goto end_seq_n_fail;
+      target = rtl_hooks.gen_lowpart_no_emit (GET_MODE (XEXP (a, op != AND)), 
target);
+      gcc_assert (target);
+    }
   if (!target)
     goto end_seq_n_fail;
 
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to