Sorry, I didn't see this message. Please see my responses below: >-----Original Message----- >From: Marc Glisse [mailto:marc.gli...@inria.fr] >Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 7:04 AM >To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis; Iyer, Balaji V; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); Jeff >Law; >r...@redhat.com >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Merging Cilk Plus into Trunk (Patch 1 of approximately 22) > >On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, Marc Glisse wrote: > >> AFAIU, my_func is defined in a separate library and because of the >> attribute on the definition, it will actually export overloads: >> int myfunc(int,int); >> v2si myfunc(v2si,v2si); >> v4si myfunc(v4si,v4si); >> etc (where does it stop? seems problematic if the library is compiled >> for >> sse4 and I then compile and link an avx program) > >According to the doc, it only generates one of these vector versions (even more >risk of mismatch). > >Does it actually create the extra declaration in the front-end, i.e. can I >explicitly >call myfunc on a v4si that I created myself, or is the middle-end the only >user?
Yes you can call the function yourself. > >-- >Marc Glisse
