On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/06/2012 02:37 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> In all this seems unrelated to CILK+ work (even if you make use of this >> from within CILK+). > > While true, we also asked him to split up the work. And this piece, > done correctly, seems useful even if the rest of cilk is ignored.
Fully agreed. The language/front-end modifications need more discussion and explanation though. -- Gaby
