On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 14:39 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > I don't feel the m32c change needs my specific ack, it's a harmless > change that goes with the ack for the feature itself. > > However, I will note that m32c does have different costs for addresses > in different address spaces, at least when -Os. >
I have created http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54496 for this. Cheers, Oleg
