On 09/05/2012 06:41 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Thanks for looking into this. Now I wonder if we made progress on a couple of long standing PRs where we weren't strict enough by one with the number of 'template <>'. Let me check...Nope, apparently c++/24314 is still there. But maybe it's easier to fix now (I suspect however that the problem has to do with the logic of num_template_headers_for_class, which I think you didn't change)
Paolo.
