On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>> +/* Compact representation of a index <-> resolution pair. Unpacked to an
>> + vector later. */
>> +struct res_pair
>> +{
>> + ld_plugin_symbol_resolution_t res;
>> + unsigned index;
>> +};
>> +typedef struct res_pair res_pair;
>> +
>> +DEF_VEC_P(res_pair);
>> +DEF_VEC_ALLOC_P(res_pair, heap);
>
> Did you mean to use DEF_VEC_O here?
> (Not sure it matters after the vec rewrite for c++)
Should be indeed _O. Ok with that change (double-check it still works
with the recent VEC C++ changes). Ok to backport, check again if it works
properly though!
Thanks,
Richard.
> Ciao!
> Steven
