Hi Joseph, On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 11:35:31PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > > > In any case these patches aren't actually suitable for consideration at > > > present, given that the represent as part of C2y something that has not > > > so > > > far been accepted into C2y. > > > > Okay, I'll resend as GNU extension (thus, adjusting diagnostics). If > > I do that, should I keep the name as _Maxof, or should I use __maxof__? > > I don't think the name should change. But if you want to propose this as > a GNU extension in the absence of inclusion in C2y, you do of course need > to reach agreement on the semantics regarding bool with the GCC community.
Yup, I'll leave that part to the end. After all, that's just a one line change (plus a few more in the tests). I'm purposefully deferring that discussion for now. Have a lovely day! Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es> Use port 80 (that is, <...:80/>).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
