On Monday, 3 November 2025, Xavier Bonaventura <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, sorry but I screwed up my previous mail. This is my first patch and > the first time I submit a patch to a mailing list. > > Now that I know how to add an introduction before sending a patch, let > me explain a bit. > When taking a look to the test suite of the standard library I found > what I believe it was a missing test case. I do not think this is > intentional. Because I believe the change is trivial (famous last words) > I just provide the patch. > I run the tests for 18_support for unix and they were passing. > I read quite a lot of documents about contributing, but I might have > miss some part. If that is the case let me know and sorry for that. > Thanks, the patch looks correct. But we could also just add those lines to the existing values.cc guarded by #if __cpluscplus >= 201103 I don't think there's any advantage to testing once with the long long constants and again with them. One test is enough.
