Hi Joseph,

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 09:29:13PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> 
> > > feature is "like N3628 but with changes X and Y" it needs to be stated 
> > > explicitly.
> > 
> > Yep.  I'll instead send a new N document removing bool from the
> > supported types, and then refer to that.
> 
> As a matter of language design, I think it's better to include bool rather 
> than exclude it.

I've been thinking about it a few times, and I think I still want to
exclude it.  We have no BOOL_MIN and BOOL_MAX macros for a reason.
This pair of operators only makes sense where *_MIN and *_MAX are
currently used (and extending to _Generic selections of those same
types).

I'll update the wg14 proposal with this.


Have a lovely night!
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
Use port 80 (that is, <...:80/>).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to