This testcase is testing at optimization but with targets that don't
have vectors it will fail because there will be zero VEC_PERM_EXPR.
So instead let's check earlier in say forwprop3.
Pushed as obvious after a test on x86_64-linux-gnu with -mno-sse.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/fold-vecperm-1.c: Test at forwprop3.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <[email protected]>
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-vecperm-1.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-vecperm-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-vecperm-1.c
index 5d4456b98b1..878d3920803 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-vecperm-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-vecperm-1.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-forwprop3" } */
typedef int v4si __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
typedef short v8hi __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
@@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ int128 concat (int128 a, int128 b) {
return res;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "VEC_PERM_EXPR" 1 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "VEC_PERM_EXPR" 1 "forwprop3" } } */
--
2.43.0
