"Jose E. Marchesi" <[email protected]> writes: > [...] > > QUESTION: The remainding patches are specific to the Algol 68 support > and do not touch common code/infrastructure. Should I purse explicit > reviews for these?
AFAIK no. For cobol, I don't think we did that, and I don't think it really makes sense to require it. I know for cobol, richi, jakub & others did go over it to help with "integration"-style issues because they explicitly asked for help on identifying such problems, but that was less about approval per-se and more about getting the code up to scratch. richi or jakub can correct me if I'm wrong. > [...] > The compiler driver is called `ga68'. > The compiler proper is called `a681'. > The run-time library is called `libga68'. > I tried wiring this up in our packaging last night and am pleased to report it built and installed correctly on the first attempt! > [...] sam
