September 27, 2025 at 5:24 PM, "Marc Poulhiès" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]?to=%22Marc%20Poulhi%C3%A8s%22%20%3Cdkm%40kataplop.net%3E > wrote:
> > As discussed during the GNU Cauldron 2025, any difference with DCO 1.1 > is a bug. > Hello, I'm dropping my proposed change. It was brought to my attention that a patch is already is review: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/[email protected]/ It's been a while since the last reply, but maybe this can act as a PING :) It would be nice to have that "real name requirement" removed. Thanks, Marc > Signed-off-by: Marc Poulhiès <[email protected]> > --- > Hello, > > as discussed during the session today, I get that this name requirement is a > "bug" and > should be dropped. The other 4 points are identical to current DCO 1.1 text. > > htdocs/dco.html | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/htdocs/dco.html b/htdocs/dco.html > index 68fa183b..1591b033 100644 > --- a/htdocs/dco.html > +++ b/htdocs/dco.html > @@ -54,8 +54,7 @@ then you just add a line saying: > > <pre> Signed-off-by: Random J Developer > <[email protected]></pre> > > -using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.) This > -will be done for you automatically if you use `git commit -s`. > +This will be done for you automatically if you use `git commit -s`. > > <p>Some people also put extra optional tags at the end. The GCC project does > not require tags from anyone other than the original author of the patch, but > -- > 2.43.0 >
