On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> I have finally applied this series of 14 patches to the mainline today.
>> The SVN revisions are from r186965 to r186978.
>
> Shouldn't we document this in the release notes?
>
> What do you guys think about the following? Suggestions welcome.
Good idea. See suggestion below.
>
> Gerald
>
> Index: changes.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.17
> diff -u -3 -p -r1.17 changes.html
> --- changes.html 20 Aug 2012 12:23:39 -0000 1.17
> +++ changes.html 26 Aug 2012 00:27:32 -0000
> @@ -56,9 +56,14 @@ by this change.</p>
> -->
>
>
> -<!--
> <h3>C family</h3>
> --->
> +
> + <ul>
> + <li>The option <code>-ftrack-macro-expansion=2</code> is now
> + enabled by default. This allows the compiler to emit diagnostic
> + about the current macro expansion stack when a compilation error
> + occurs.</li>
> + </ul>
What about replacing the last sentence with:
This allows the compiler to display macro expansion stack in
diagnostics.
I think we show the stack not just for errors, but for any diagnostics.
