On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote: > But iterators don't have to imply non-sequential storage. Using > iterators instead of pointers would allow you to store them in a > std::deque, for example, or in a std::vector using > std::back_insert_iterator.
Yes, and this is already trivial to do with the operator() interface. The fill() interface is needed for performance, everything else is taken care by the operator() interface.
