Hi!

The following patch implements the
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3457.htm
paper without the first 3 lines in Recommended practice.
Seems GCC behavior already matches the expected behavior except for
diagnostics of more than 2147483648 __COUNTER__ expansions, so the
patch adds a diagnostic for that (but not testcase because
#define A __COUNTER__ __COUNTER__ __COUNTER__ __COUNTER__ __COUNTER__ 
__COUNTER__ __COUNTER__ __COUNTER__
#define B A A A A A A A A
#define C B B B B B B B B
#define D C C C C C C C C
#define E D D D D D D D D
#define F E E E E E E E E
#define G F F F F F F F F
#define H G G G G G G G G
#define I H H H H H H H H
#define J I I I I I I I I
J J J J
__COUNTER__
just takes too long to preprocess).
Plus I've included all the snippets from the paper into one testcase.

Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

2025-09-01  Jakub Jelinek  <[email protected]>

        * macro.cc: Implement C2Y N3457 - The __COUNTER__ predefined macro.
        (_cpp_builtin_macro_text): Diagnose if __COUNTER__ reaches
        2147483648 value.

        * gcc.dg/cpp/c2y-counter-1.c: New test.

--- libcpp/macro.cc.jj  2025-08-15 22:31:17.289081163 +0200
+++ libcpp/macro.cc     2025-09-01 14:42:38.786893989 +0200
@@ -733,6 +733,9 @@ _cpp_builtin_macro_text (cpp_reader *pfi
                   "%<__COUNTER__%> expanded inside directive with "
                   "%<-fdirectives-only%>");
       number = pfile->counter++;
+      if (number == 0x80000000U)
+       cpp_error (pfile, CPP_DL_ERROR,
+                  "%<__COUNTER__%> expanded more than 2147483648 times");
       break;
 
     case BT_HAS_ATTRIBUTE:
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/c2y-counter-1.c.jj 2025-09-01 13:54:35.449359797 
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/c2y-counter-1.c    2025-09-01 14:09:01.743143429 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/* N3457 - The __COUNTER__ predefined macro */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c2y -pedantic-errors" } */
+
+#ifndef __COUNTER__
+#error "__COUNTER__ not defined"
+#endif
+
+#define A(X) X + X
+static_assert (A(__COUNTER__) == 0);
+#define B(X)
+B(__COUNTER__)
+static_assert (__COUNTER__ == 1);
+#define C(...) __VA_OPT__()
+C(__COUNTER__)
+static_assert (__COUNTER__ == 3);
+#define D(...) __VA_OPT__(a)
+int D(__COUNTER__) = 1;
+static_assert (__COUNTER__ == 5);
+#define E(X) #X
+const char *b = E(__COUNTER__);
+#define F(X) a##X
+int F(__COUNTER__) = 2;
+static_assert (__COUNTER__ == 6);
+#define G(X) b##X = X
+int G(__COUNTER__);
+static_assert (__COUNTER__ == 8);
+#if !defined(__COUNTER__) || (__COUNTER__ + 1 != __COUNTER__ + 0)
+#error "Unexpected __COUNTER__ behavior")
+#endif
+static_assert (__COUNTER__ == 11);
+
+extern int strcmp (const char *, const char *);
+extern void abort ();
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  if (a != 1
+      || strcmp (b, "__COUNTER__")
+      || a__COUNTER__ != 2
+      || b__COUNTER__ != 7)
+    abort ();
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to