On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 01:01:37PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2025, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 01:16:56AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > > > +/* Compute KCFI type ID for a function declaration or function type
> > > > (internal) */
> > > > +static uint32_t
> > > > +compute_kcfi_type_id (tree fntype_or_fndecl)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (!fntype_or_fndecl)
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + const char *canonical_name = mangle_function_type (fntype_or_fndecl);
> > > > + uint32_t base_type_id = kcfi_hash_string (canonical_name);
> > > >
> > >
> > > Now I am curious why this needs to be a mangled function name? Since the
> > > function in C the symbol is just its name.
> > > Is there documentation that says the hash needs to be based on all of the
> > > function arguments types?
> >
> > The whole point of kCFI is to limit the targets of indirect calls to
> > functions of the same signature. The actual function name is immaterial.
>
> What's the attack vector and how does kCFI achieve mitigating it?
Any of the attacks that can result in scribbling a function pointer.
Typically a buffer overflow I suppose.
The way kCFI works is by changing the indirect call ABI. Traditionally
the indirect call is simply:
load-pointer-into-reg
call *%reg
kCFI changes every function to have a preamble like (with IBT and
retpolines and all the modern crap on):
__cfi_\func:
movl $0x12345678, %eax
nop
nop
nop
nop
nop
nop
nop
nop
nop
nop
nop
\func:
endbr64
...
And every indirect call site to:
load-pointer-into-r11
movl $(-0x12345678), %r10d
addl $-15(%r11), %r10d
je 2f
1:ud2
.pushsection .kcfi_traps
.long 1b - .
.popsection
2:cs call __x86_indirect_thunk_r11
Where 0x12345678 is the appropriate signature hash.
So if the loaded pointer is scribbled somehow, the hash embedded at the
callsite no longer matches the hash in the function preamble and #UD.
The kernel is also going to rewrite this if the hardware supports IBT,
into a FineIBT sequence (with too many variants :-/), but I'll spare you
those details.
Those people interested can find it here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c#n1298
