So this is a minor bug in the riscv move expanders. It has a special cases for extraction from vector objects which makes assumptions that it can use gen_lowpart unconditionally. That's not always the case.

We can just bypass that special code for cases where we can't use gen_lowpart and let the more generic code run. If gen_lowpart_common indicates we've got a case that can't be handled we just bypass the special extraction code.

Tested on riscv64-elf and riscv32-elf. Waiting for pre-commit CI to do its thing.

Jeff
        PR target/119275
gcc/
        * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_legitimize_move): Avoid calling
        gen_lowpart for cases where it'll fail.  Just use standard expander
        paths for those cases.


gcc/testsuite/
        * gcc.target/riscv/pr119275.c: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index e394cac7d417..e9217dcb0433 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -3685,7 +3685,8 @@ riscv_legitimize_move (machine_mode mode, rtx dest, rtx 
src)
       /* This test can fail if (for example) we want a HF and Z[v]fh is
         not enabled.  In that case we just want to let the standard
         expansion path run.  */
-      if (riscv_vector::get_vector_mode (smode, nunits).exists (&vmode))
+      if (riscv_vector::get_vector_mode (smode, nunits).exists (&vmode)
+         && gen_lowpart_common (vmode, SUBREG_REG (src)))
        {
          rtx v = gen_lowpart (vmode, SUBREG_REG (src));
          rtx int_reg = dest;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr119275.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr119275.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..02a1a7bebd23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr119275.c
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gv -mabi=lp64d -mrvv-vector-bits=zvl" { target { 
rv64 } } } */
+
+__int128 h, j;
+int y;
+double d;
+void *p;
+char *q;
+char x;
+long u;
+
+char *bar(int, int);
+
+typedef __attribute__((__vector_size__ (2))) char V;
+
+void
+foo(V v)
+{
+  x += *bar (0, 0);
+  for(;;) {
+    __builtin_strcat (p, 7 + q);
+    d += __builtin_stdc_rotate_left (
+        (unsigned __int128) u | h << *__builtin_strcat (p, 7 + q), j);
+    u += (long) __builtin_memmove (&y, &v, 2);
+  }
+}

Reply via email to