Hi Jerry, thanks for the review. Pushed as gcc-16-2086-gd1f05661fa6.
Thanks again, Andre On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 10:49:50 -0700 Jerry D <jvdelis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/7/25 8:39 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > Ping! > > > OK for mainline. > > Thanks, > > Jerry > > > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 15:32:47 +0200 > > Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I found a bug in the module cleanup expression at the end of the test. In > >> the attached patch it is corrected. > >> > >> Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Andre > >> > >> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:48:11 +0200 > >> Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Antony Lewis reported this issue and also proposed a patch, that removes > >>> the was_finalized tracking. While this may lead to the desired effect for > >>> the issue at hand, I don't believe that the was_finalized tracking code > >>> has been there for no reason. > >>> > >>> This patch fixes the issue that also Antony found, but by ensuring the > >>> expression stays allocated when used instead of being freeed. > >>> > >>> The test has been put into the asan directory of gfortran.dg and reliably > >>> reports the issue without the fix. (With the fix, the asan is quite). > >>> > >>> Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linxu-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Andre > >> > >> > > > > > -- Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de