Hi Jerry,

thanks for the review. Pushed as gcc-16-2086-gd1f05661fa6.

Thanks again, 
        Andre

On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 10:49:50 -0700
Jerry D <jvdelis...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7/7/25 8:39 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> > Ping!  
> 
> 
> OK for mainline.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jerry
> > 
> > On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 15:32:47 +0200
> > Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >   
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I found a bug in the module cleanup expression at the end of the test. In
> >> the attached patch it is corrected.
> >>
> >> Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>    Andre
> >>
> >> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:48:11 +0200
> >> Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >>  
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Antony Lewis reported this issue and also proposed a patch, that removes
> >>> the was_finalized tracking. While this may lead to the desired effect for
> >>> the issue at hand, I don't believe that the was_finalized tracking code
> >>> has been there for no reason.
> >>>
> >>> This patch fixes the issue that also Antony found, but by ensuring the
> >>> expression stays allocated when used instead of being freeed.
> >>>
> >>> The test has been put into the asan directory of gfortran.dg and reliably
> >>> reports the issue without the fix. (With the fix, the asan is quite).
> >>>
> >>> Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linxu-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>   Andre  
> >>
> >>  
> > 
> >   
> 


-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de 

Reply via email to