git branch gir checkout git add git commit git rebase git push It’s time to move beyond emailing patches! (Please.)
Damian On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 03:17 Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I successfully created a big mess with the previous patch. First of all by > applying an outdated one and secondly by adding the conformance checks for > coranks in a3f1cdd8ed46f9816b31ab162ae4dac547d34ebc. Checking the standard > even > using AI (haha) to figure if coranks of an expression have restrictions on > them, failed. I found nothing. AI fantasized about restrictions that did > not > exist. Therefore the current approach is to remove the conformance check > and > just use the computed coranks in expressions to prevent recomputaion > whenever > they needed. > > Jerry, Harald: Sorry for all the bother and all my mistakes. I am really > sorry > to have wasted your time. > > The patch has been regtested fine on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for > mainline > and later backport to gcc-15? > > Regards, > Andre > > On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 11:17:58 +0200 > Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > Hi Harald, > > > > thanks for the review. Committed as gcc-16-1885-g1b0930e9046. > > > > Will backport to gcc-15 in about a week. > > > > Thanks again. > > > > Regards, > > Andre > > > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 22:31:08 +0200 > > Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > > Am 30.06.25 um 15:25 schrieb Andre Vehreschild: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > here now the version of the patch that seems to be more complete. > > > > > > > > Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline and later > > > > backport to gcc-15? > > > > > > This looks good to me. OK for both. > > > > > > Thanks for the patch! > > > > > > Harald > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Andre > > > > > > > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 15:44:20 +0200 > > > > Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > > > > >> I take this patch back. It seems to be incomplete. > > > >> > > > >> - Andre > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 14:45:36 +0200 > > > >> Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi all, > > > >>> > > > >>> this patch fixes a reject valid when the coranks of two operands > do not > > > >>> match and no coindex is given. I.e. when only an implicit > this_image > > > >>> co-ref is used. > > > >>> > > > >>> Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline? > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >>> Andre > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de >
