On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 05:17:55PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I've pushed those changes.
Great.
> > /* For a non-pointer simple base reference, express it as a
> > COMPONENT_REF
> > without taking its address (and so causing lambda capture, 91933).
> > */
> > - if (code == PLUS_EXPR && !v_binfo && !want_pointer && !has_empty &&
> > !uneval)
> > + if (code == PLUS_EXPR
> > + && !want_pointer
> > + && !has_empty
> > + && !uneval
> > + && (!v_binfo || !virtual_access))
>
> This can just be !virtual_access since !v_binfo implies !virtual_access.
>
> OK with that tweak.
Thanks, committed now (without your -fno-implicit-constexpr tweaks, I hope
that can be committed separately).
Jakub
