On Tue, 10 Jun 2025, Martin Uecker wrote: > When looking for the casue of PR120510 I noticed there > is some minor issues that make the code harder to understand > which are left over from previous changes. > > Bootstrapped and regression tested for x86_64. > > > c: clean up some functions in c-typeck.cc > > This removes two unnecessary variables and replaces 1/0 with > true/false for two functions with boolean return type. > > gcc/c/ChangeLog: > * c-typeck.c (function_types_compatible_p): Remove unused > variables and return true/false instead of 1/0. > (type_lists_compatible_p): Return false instead of 0.
OK. -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com
