On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 15:48:27 +0200 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> In any case, the class doesn't have any constexpr constructors, so > it isn't a literal type, one can't construct those objects in constant > expressions and so using constexpr keyword for the defaulted copy > assignment operator can't help because that needs to copy from a > constant expression which isn't possible to construct. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk? Yes please and thank you. I don't understand constexpr yet, why the programmer instead of the compiler decides the question. But not valid is not valid. --jkl
