> Should I go with:
>
> +autofdo_target
>
> +autofdo_target="i386"
> +case "${target}" in
> + aarch64-*-*)
> + autofdo_target="aarch64"
> + ;;
> +esac
>
> As in the first version? I can test and send a patch for review if there is
> no other better alternative.
This looks OK - I can not think of better alternative. At some point we
need to translate the target CPU to directory name. The build machinery
is not exactly my strong point, so perhaps someone with more knowledge
can chime in.
Honza
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kugan
>
> >
> > Honza
> >>
> >> Richard
>
