The discussion for v4 is here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2025-May/061665.html

The non-trivial changes are:

  * Fixed bug in __offset that called m(0...) even for empty extents; added a
    test.
  * Fixed buggy tests for class mandates.
  * Fix layout_stride::is_{,always_}exhaustive.
  * Fix missing private (2x).
  * Use cmp_equal in layout_stride::operator==
  * Use cmp_equal in tests for std::extents (added to first commit).

Additionally:

  * added __empty,
  * cleaned up parens near `requires`,
  * changed __mapping_like to __mapping_alike,
  * use extents_type instead of _Extents,
  * don't comment on deviation.

Luc Grosheintz (8):
  libstdc++: Improve naming, whitespace and silence warnings for
    extents.
  libstdc++: Implement layout_left from mdspan.
  libstdc++: Add tests for layout_left.
  libstdc++: Implement layout_right from mdspan.
  libstdc++: Add tests for layout_right.
  libstdc++: Implement layout_stride from mdspan.
  libstdc++: Add tests for layout_stride.
  libstdc++: Make layout_left(layout_stride) noexcept.

 libstdc++-v3/include/std/mdspan               | 725 +++++++++++++++++-
 libstdc++-v3/src/c++23/std.cc.in              |   5 +-
 .../mdspan/extents/ctor_default.cc            |   2 +-
 .../mdspan/layouts/class_mandate_neg.cc       |  42 +
 .../23_containers/mdspan/layouts/ctors.cc     | 438 +++++++++++
 .../23_containers/mdspan/layouts/empty.cc     |  69 ++
 .../23_containers/mdspan/layouts/mapping.cc   | 568 ++++++++++++++
 .../23_containers/mdspan/layouts/stride.cc    | 526 +++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 2360 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/mdspan/layouts/class_mandate_neg.cc
 create mode 100644 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/mdspan/layouts/ctors.cc
 create mode 100644 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/mdspan/layouts/empty.cc
 create mode 100644 
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/mdspan/layouts/mapping.cc
 create mode 100644 
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/mdspan/layouts/stride.cc

-- 
2.49.0

Reply via email to