On Wed, 21 May 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Makes sense. I'm unsure where exactly I should put it. Is this okay? > > diff --git i/gcc/c/c-parser.cc w/gcc/c/c-parser.cc > index 87700339394b..08350a216dd8 100644 > --- i/gcc/c/c-parser.cc > +++ w/gcc/c/c-parser.cc > @@ -10456,20 +10456,22 @@ c_parser_cast_expression (c_parser *parser, > struct c_expr *after) > return c_parser_unary_expression (parser); > } > > /* Parse an unary expression (C90 6.3.3, C99 6.5.3, C11 6.5.3). > > unary-expression: > postfix-expression > ++ unary-expression > -- unary-expression > unary-operator cast-expression > + _Countof unary-expression > + _Countof ( type-name )
With some kind of remark to indicate it's new in C2Y, yes. E.g. c_parser_generic_selection's comment says "(The use of a type-name is new in C2Y.)". -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com
