Hi,
bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64 linux. Ok to push?
Filip Kastl
-- 8< ---
I have mistakenly assumed that switch lowering cannot encounter a switch
with zero clusters. This patch removes the relevant assert and instead
gives up bit-test lowering when this happens.
PR tree-optimization/120080
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-switch-conversion.cc (bit_test_cluster::find_bit_tests):
Replace assert with return.
Signed-off-by: Filip Kastl <[email protected]>
---
gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc
index dea217a01ef..bd4de966892 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc
@@ -1793,12 +1793,14 @@ bit_test_cluster::find_bit_tests (vec<cluster *>
&clusters, int max_c)
end up with as few clusters as possible. */
unsigned l = clusters.length ();
- auto_vec<min_cluster_item> min;
- min.reserve (l + 1);
- gcc_checking_assert (l > 0);
+ if (l == 0)
+ return clusters.copy ();
gcc_checking_assert (l <= INT_MAX);
+ auto_vec<min_cluster_item> min;
+ min.reserve (l + 1);
+
int bits_in_word = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (word_mode);
/* First phase: Compute the minimum number of clusters for each prefix of the
--
2.49.0
