> OK, understood. I think that's expected given the fine granularity of the > tests. IMHO nothing that should block progress.
Thanks Robin, then we can move to other vx/vf insns. Pan -----Original Message----- From: Robin Dapp <rdapp....@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2025 11:44 PM To: Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com>; Robin Dapp <rdapp....@gmail.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; Chen, Ken <ken.c...@intel.com>; Liu, Hongtao <hongtao....@intel.com>; Robin Dapp <rdapp....@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Add testcases for another case of vec_duplicate + vadd.vv combine >> it's just a vector cost model issue and some loops are not profitable >> to vectorize? > > Yes. For example, when gpr2vr is 1, int8_t cannot vectorize while uint8_t can. OK, understood. I think that's expected given the fine granularity of the tests. IMHO nothing that should block progress. -- Regards Robin
