Four COBOL patches have remained unreviewed for a month. They are
required to get the cobol1 and libgcobol to build on Solaris:
cobol: Don't require GLOB_BRACE etc. [PR119217]
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/680675.html
cobol: Initialize regmatch_t portably [PR119217]
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/680676.html
It's unclear how to proceed with this one: my simple patch or Jakub's
proposal.
cobol: Allow for undefined NAME_MAX [PR119217]
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/680682.html
This one is unclear, too: for one, it turned out that the use of
NAME_MAX isn't related to filenames at all (which suggests just
replacing the macro with it's Linux value, 255), but also Richi's
observation that cbl_funtion_t.name is never set all all (which suggests
removing it completely).
libgcobol: Heed --enable-libgcobol
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/680684.html
This allows --enable-libgcobol to enable building the runtime lib even
if the target isn't listed as supported in configure.tgt.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
