On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 12:20:18PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Here is the incremental patch I was talking about.
> For noop sets, we don't need to test much, they can go to i2
> unless that would violate i3 JUMP condition.
> 
> With this the try_combine on the pr119291.c testcase doesn't fail,
> but succeeds and we get
> (insn 22 21 23 4 (set (pc)
>         (pc)) "pr119291.c":27:15 2147483647 {NOOP_MOVE}
>      (nil))
> (insn 23 22 24 4 (set (reg/v:SI 117 [ e ])
>         (reg/v:SI 116 [ e ])) 96 {*movsi_internal}
>      (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:SI 116 [ e ])
>         (nil)))
> (note 24 23 25 4 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
> (insn 25 24 26 4 (set (reg/v:SI 116 [ e ])
>         (const_int 0 [0])) "pr119291.c":28:13 96 {*movsi_internal}
>      (nil))
> (note 26 25 27 4 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
> (insn 27 26 28 4 (set (reg:DI 128 [ _9 ])
>         (const_int 0 [0])) "pr119291.c":28:13 95 {*movdi_internal}
>      (nil))
> after it.

I'd like to ping the 
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/679573.html
patch.

Ok for trunk?

> 2025-03-28  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       * combine.cc (try_combine): Sets which satisfy set_noop_p can go
>       to i2 unless i3 is a jump and the other set is not.
> 
> --- gcc/combine.cc.jj 2025-03-28 11:44:15.491458700 +0100
> +++ gcc/combine.cc    2025-03-28 12:11:49.505835983 +0100
> @@ -4017,13 +4017,14 @@ try_combine (rtx_insn *i3, rtx_insn *i2,
>        in i3, so we need to make sure that we won't wrongly hoist a SET
>        to i2 that would conflict with a death note present in there, or
>        would have its dest modified or used between i2 and i3.  */
> -      if (!modified_between_p (SET_SRC (set1), i2, i3)
> -       && !(REG_P (SET_DEST (set1))
> -            && find_reg_note (i2, REG_DEAD, SET_DEST (set1)))
> -       && !(GET_CODE (SET_DEST (set1)) == SUBREG
> -            && find_reg_note (i2, REG_DEAD,
> -                              SUBREG_REG (SET_DEST (set1))))
> -       && !reg_used_between_p (SET_DEST (set1), i2, i3)
> +      if ((set_noop_p (set1)
> +        || (!modified_between_p (SET_SRC (set1), i2, i3)
> +            && !(REG_P (SET_DEST (set1))
> +                 && find_reg_note (i2, REG_DEAD, SET_DEST (set1)))
> +            && !(GET_CODE (SET_DEST (set1)) == SUBREG
> +                 && find_reg_note (i2, REG_DEAD,
> +                                   SUBREG_REG (SET_DEST (set1))))
> +            && !reg_used_between_p (SET_DEST (set1), i2, i3)))
>         /* If I3 is a jump, ensure that set0 is a jump so that
>            we do not create invalid RTL.  */
>         && (!JUMP_P (i3) || SET_DEST (set0) == pc_rtx)
> @@ -4032,13 +4033,14 @@ try_combine (rtx_insn *i3, rtx_insn *i2,
>         newi2pat = set1;
>         newpat = set0;
>       }
> -      else if (!modified_between_p (SET_SRC (set0), i2, i3)
> -            && !(REG_P (SET_DEST (set0))
> -                 && find_reg_note (i2, REG_DEAD, SET_DEST (set0)))
> -            && !(GET_CODE (SET_DEST (set0)) == SUBREG
> -                 && find_reg_note (i2, REG_DEAD,
> -                                   SUBREG_REG (SET_DEST (set0))))
> -            && !reg_used_between_p (SET_DEST (set0), i2, i3)
> +      else if ((set_noop_p (set0)
> +             || (!modified_between_p (SET_SRC (set0), i2, i3)
> +                 && !(REG_P (SET_DEST (set0))
> +                      && find_reg_note (i2, REG_DEAD, SET_DEST (set0)))
> +                 && !(GET_CODE (SET_DEST (set0)) == SUBREG
> +                      && find_reg_note (i2, REG_DEAD,
> +                                        SUBREG_REG (SET_DEST (set0))))
> +                 && !reg_used_between_p (SET_DEST (set0), i2, i3)))
>              /* If I3 is a jump, ensure that set1 is a jump so that
>                 we do not create invalid RTL.  */
>              && (!JUMP_P (i3) || SET_DEST (set1) == pc_rtx)

        Jakub

Reply via email to