Hi, according to Jeff's requirement (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681864.html), I divide the change of riscv_register_move_cost into separate patch. Please help to review. Thanks.
Zhijin From b4c581393e864619192034bd8000c7e89443c19a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhijin Zeng <zengzhi...@linux.spacemit.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 09:24:16 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix register move cost for SIBCALL_REGS/JALR_REGS SIBCALL_REGS/JALR_REGS are also subset of GR_REGS and need to be taken into acount in riscv_register_move_cost, otherwise it will get a incorrect cost. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_register_move_cost): --- gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc index bad59e248d0..c53e0dd7a7d 100644 --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc @@ -9650,10 +9650,10 @@ int riscv_register_move_cost (machine_mode mode, reg_class_t from, reg_class_t to) { - bool from_is_fpr = from == FP_REGS || from == RVC_FP_REGS; - bool from_is_gpr = from == GR_REGS || from == RVC_GR_REGS; - bool to_is_fpr = to == FP_REGS || to == RVC_FP_REGS; - bool to_is_gpr = to == GR_REGS || to == RVC_GR_REGS; + bool from_is_fpr = reg_class_subset_p (from, FP_REGS); + bool from_is_gpr = reg_class_subset_p (from, GR_REGS); + bool to_is_fpr = reg_class_subset_p (to, FP_REGS); + bool to_is_gpr = reg_class_subset_p (to, GR_REGS); if ((from_is_fpr && to_is_gpr) || (from_is_gpr && to_is_fpr)) return tune_param->fmv_cost; -- 2.25.1