Hi Jerry, hi Paul,
thanks for the review. Committed as gcc-16-79-g6e3b92848b5 (for the 6 of 5
commit) on mainline.
Thanks again for the fast review.
Regards,
Andre
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 18:27:03 -0700
Jerry D <jvdelis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/18/25 9:13 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 14:20, Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de
> > <mailto:ve...@gmx.de>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jerry,
> >
> > thanks for the review and sorry for the long delay. With publishing
> > the team's
> > patches for gfortran, I also created a pull request for
> > OpenCoarrays. There I
> > was asked to add some testcase with more "beef" in it. I.e.
> > something that
> > really makes use of teams and not only smoke tests it. This
> > unfortunately made
> > me discover some issues, that I needed to fix. The attached patch 6/5
> > addresses these issues. Some of them were as easy as not being able
> > to exit out
> > of change team block or an end team with a label not being parsed
> > correctly and
> > not generated in resulting binary. Others were more subtle, like
> > having to
> > create coarray tokens for association in the change team.
> >
> > The attached patch addresses all these issues and
> >
> > bootstraps and regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for
> > mainline?
> >
> > Btw, do I still merge to master, or am I to wait for the bump to
> > 16th master?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andre
> >
> > This all looks good to me, except for two tiny nits. It looks as if we
> > are already on 16-branch :-(
> >
> > I have been religiously ending ChangeLogs at column 72 since I started
> > supporting gfortran. If this is still a requirement, I suggest:
> > line 14: s/it is/it's/
> > line 23: carry "are" over to the next line.
> >
> > OK for mainline and, I would suggest, backporting to 15-branch asap.
> >
> > Thanks for the patch
> >
> > Paul
> >
>
> Agree, Andre OK for 16, proceed.
>
> Jerry
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
