On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 09:49, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 09:29:16AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 08:58, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > We forgot to update these timely, sorry for that, the following patch
> > > updates them from the 15.1-rc1 builds in Fedora.
> > >
> > > Ok for trunk and 15?
> > >
> > > 2025-04-22  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> > >
> > >         * config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
> > >         * config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/32/baseline_symbols.txt: 
> > > Update.
> > >         * config/abi/post/i486-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
> > >         * config/abi/post/aarch64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
> > >         * config/abi/post/s390x-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
> > >         * config/abi/post/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: 
> > > Update.
> > >
> > > --- libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt.jj 
> > >       2024-04-11 16:37:22.625001351 +0200
> > > +++ libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt  
> > > 2025-04-22 09:52:38.360802666 +0200
> > > @@ -2124,6 +2124,10 @@ FUNC:_ZNSt12__shared_ptrINSt10filesystem
> > >  
> > > FUNC:_ZNSt12__shared_ptrINSt10filesystem7__cxx114_DirELN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EEC2EOS5_@@GLIBCXX_3.4.28
> > >  
> > > FUNC:_ZNSt12__shared_ptrINSt10filesystem7__cxx114_DirELN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EEC2Ev@@GLIBCXX_3.4.27
> > >  
> > > FUNC:_ZNSt12__shared_ptrINSt10filesystem7__cxx114_DirELN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EEaSEOS5_@@GLIBCXX_3.4.26
> > > +FUNC:_ZNSt12__sso_stringC1Ev@@GLIBCXX_3.4.34
> > > +FUNC:_ZNSt12__sso_stringC2Ev@@GLIBCXX_3.4.34
> > > +FUNC:_ZNSt12__sso_stringD1Ev@@GLIBCXX_3.4.34
> > > +FUNC:_ZNSt12__sso_stringD2Ev@@GLIBCXX_3.4.34
> >
> > I'm curious where these come from, and why they are present now but
> > weren't needed before.
>
> Are you going to investigate or should I?
> Note, Rainer has it in his patches as well.

I realised where it comes from and posted a second reply shortly after
the first. The patches are approved - thanks!

Reply via email to