On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 17:38, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > In r14-7153-gadbc46942aee75 we removed a duplicate definition of > __glibcxx_want_range_iota from <ranges>, but __cpp_lib_ranges_iota > should be defined in <ranges> at all.
Oops, that was meant to say "should not be defined" > > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > > * include/std/ranges (__glibcxx_want_ranges_iota): Do not > define. > --- > > Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk. > > libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges > index 7a339c51368..9300c364a16 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges > @@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ > #define __glibcxx_want_ranges_chunk > #define __glibcxx_want_ranges_chunk_by > #define __glibcxx_want_ranges_enumerate > -#define __glibcxx_want_ranges_iota > #define __glibcxx_want_ranges_join_with > #define __glibcxx_want_ranges_repeat > #define __glibcxx_want_ranges_slide > -- > 2.49.0 >
