On Apr 14, 2025, Peter Bergner <berg...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On 4/11/25 1:03 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> gcc.dg/pr87600.h and gcc.dg/pr89313.c test for __powerpc__ and >> __POWERPC__ to choose ppc register names, but ppc-elf defines neither; >> it defines __PPC__, so test for that as well.
> Is there a reason why powerpc-*-elf doesn't define __powerpc__ or > __POWERPC__ like we do for other powerpc* targets? -ENOCLUE :-( It doesn't seem to be uniform. darwin.h defines __POWERPC__; 32-bit freebsd.h defines neither (though freebsd64.h defines __powerpc__ with -m32); sysv4.h defines neither. It seems to be a long and messy history. > That said, I think this probably falls under the "obvious" rule too. Thanks, -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://blog.lx.oliva.nom.br/ Free Software Activist FSFLA co-founder GNU Toolchain Engineer More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity. Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive!
