Hi Simon,
> Shouldn't that be
>
> --- a/gcc/cobol/parse.y
> +++ b/gcc/cobol/parse.y
> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@
> %token <number> INVALID
> %token <number> NUMBER NEGATIVE
> %token <numstr> NUMSTR "numeric literal"
> -%token <number> OVERFLOW
> +%token <number> OVERFLOW_kw "OVERFLOW"
> %token <computational> COMPUTATIONAL
>
>
> ? Otherwise bison syntax messages will use OVERFLOW_kw instead of the
> "real" name - if this _kw is done with other tokens in parse.y I think it
> should similarly specify the token "message identifier".
you're right. I guess it would really be best to consistently use the
*_kw form so all tokens are treated the same.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
