On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 12:38, Andrew Stubbs <a...@baylibre.com> wrote: > Otherwise LGTM. At least GCN certainly does support atomics, so the > configure test must be broken somehow.
I'm very curious why they fail.
- GCN, nvptx: Allow for "hosted" libstdc++ build Thomas Schwinge
- Re: GCN, nvptx: Allow for "hosted" libstdc+... Andrew Stubbs
- Re: GCN, nvptx: Allow for "hosted" libstdc+... Jonathan Wakely
- [PUSHED] GCN, nvptx: Don't default-disable libstdc++ ... Thomas Schwinge
- libstdc++, nvptx: Remove machinery to inject per-file... Thomas Schwinge
- GCN, nvptx libstdc++: Force use of '__atomic' builtin... Thomas Schwinge
- Re: GCN, nvptx libstdc++: Force use of '__atomic'... Andrew Stubbs
- Re: GCN, nvptx libstdc++: Force use of '__ato... Jonathan Wakely
- [PUSHED] GCN, nvptx libstdc++: Force use of '__at... Thomas Schwinge
- Re: GCN, nvptx libstdc++: Force use of '__atomic'... Jonathan Wakely
