Christophe Lyon <[email protected]> writes:
> Since r15-7878-ge1c49f413c8, these tests appear as XPASS on aarch64,
> so we can remove the xfails introduced by r12-102-gf31ddad8ac8f11.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c: Remove xfail for aarch64.
> * gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c: Likewise.
OK, thanks.
Richard
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c | 4 ++--
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c
> index 2fd884209f2..12949282516 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ int main()
> debug stmt for the final value of the loop during loop distribution
> which would fix the UNSUPPORTED cases.
> c is optimized out at -Og for no obvious reason. */
> - optimize_me_not(); /* { dg-final { gdb-test . "i + 1" "8" { xfail {
> aarch64*-*-* && { any-opts "-fno-fat-lto-objects" } } } } } */
> - /* { dg-final { gdb-test .-1 "c + 1" "2" { xfail { aarch64*-*-* && {
> any-opts "-fno-fat-lto-objects" } } } } } */
> + optimize_me_not(); /* { dg-final { gdb-test . "i + 1" "8" } } */
> + /* { dg-final { gdb-test .-1 "c + 1" "2" } } */
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c
> index fe7e5567625..b2f5c9d146e 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,6 @@ int main()
> Instead test j + 1 which will make the test UNSUPPORTED if i
> is optimized out. Since the test previously had wrong debug
> with j == 0 this is acceptable. */
> - optimize_me_not(); /* { dg-final { gdb-test . "j + 1" "9" { xfail {
> aarch64*-*-* && { any-opts "-fno-fat-lto-objects" } } } } } */
> + optimize_me_not(); /* { dg-final { gdb-test . "j + 1" "9" } } */
> return 0;
> }
