Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux, does this look
OK  for trunk/14?

-- >8 --

The testcase in this PR uses 2.5x more memory and 6x more compile
time ever since r14-5979 which implements P2280R4.  This is because
our speculative constexpr folding now does a lot more work trying to
fold ultimately non-constant calls to constexpr functions, and in turn
produces a lot of garbage.  Sometimes, we do successfully fold more
thanks to P2280R4, but it seems to be trivial stuff like calls to
std::array::size or std::addressof.  The benefit of P2280 therefore
doesn't seem worth the cost during speculative constexpr folding, so
this patch restricts the paper to only manifestly-constant evaluation.

        PR c++/119387

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * constexpr.cc (p2280_active_p): Define.
        (cxx_eval_constant_expression) <case VAR_DECL>: Use it to
        restrict P2280 relaxations.
        <case PARM_DECL>: Likewise.
---
 gcc/cp/constexpr.cc | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
index 4820bcc84aa..ee968bc4630 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -1294,6 +1294,22 @@ struct constexpr_ctx {
   mce_value manifestly_const_eval;
 };
 
+/* True if the constexpr relaxations afforded by P2280R4 for unknown
+   references and objects are in effect.  */
+
+static bool
+p2280_active_p (const constexpr_ctx *ctx)
+{
+  if (ctx->manifestly_const_eval != mce_true)
+    /* Disable these relaxations during speculative constexpr folding,
+       as it can significantly increase compile time/memory use
+       (PR119387).  */
+    return false;
+
+  /* P2280R4 is accepted as a DR back to C++11.  */
+  return cxx_dialect >= cxx11;
+}
+
 /* Remove T from the global values map, checking for attempts to destroy
    a value that has already finished its lifetime.  */
 
@@ -7792,7 +7808,7 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, 
tree t,
        r = TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (r);
       if (DECL_P (r)
          /* P2280 allows references to unknown.  */
-         && !(VAR_P (t) && TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (t))))
+         && !(p2280_active_p (ctx) && VAR_P (t) && TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (t))))
        {
          if (!ctx->quiet)
            non_const_var_error (loc, r, /*fundef_p*/false);
@@ -7844,9 +7860,9 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, 
tree t,
          r = build_constructor (TREE_TYPE (t), NULL);
          TREE_CONSTANT (r) = true;
        }
-      else if (TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (t)))
+      else if (p2280_active_p (ctx) && TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (t)))
        /* P2280 allows references to unknown...  */;
-      else if (is_this_parameter (t))
+      else if (p2280_active_p (ctx) && is_this_parameter (t))
        /* ...as well as the this pointer.  */;
       else
        {
-- 
2.49.0.111.g5b97a56fa0

Reply via email to