Hi folks > On 24 Mar 2025, at 17:15, Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 24 Mar 2025, at 16:41, Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> wrote: >>> On 24 Mar 2025, at 16:38, Robert Dubner <rdub...@symas.com> wrote: >>> >>> How about you create the new patch and just edit out the regenerated >>> configure before sending the e-mail? Typing "autoreconf" isn't hard. >> >> OK. I can do that (historically that is what we always have done, but now we >> have CI infrastructure and that does not (yet) know how to deal with partial >> patches). In this case I don’t think the 700k of generated output is >> helpful… >> >> Will do soon - I’m just rebasing on the updates fomr approved patches and >> the rust set… > > .. that’s done, based onto r15-8868-g57fdc97dac1453 > * edited out the regenerated file diffs > * retesting for good measure > * pushed “master-wip-cobol-s” to GH in case the hand-editting messes up the > patch, > > OK for trunk, (assuming that the re-tests pass) > my testing is bootstrap on x86_64 & aarch64 linux + existing testcases. > (plus x86_64 darwin with additional patches needed to get it to build) > > thanks > Iain > > <0001-libgcobol-C-ify-the-configuration-steps.patch>
There is a rebased (onto today’s trunk) version of this in https://github.com/iains/gcc-git/tree/master-wip-cobol-posted in case that helps thanks Iain
