> > This patch works passed profiledbootstrap with LTO as well as LTO -O3 > on 176.gcc in SPEC CPU 2000. I have to add 2 inline_edge_summary_vec > checks to avoid ICE. OK to install?
Thanks, it looks good. I am just concerned about... > diff --git a/gcc/ipa-split.c b/gcc/ipa-split.c > index 33cf7d2..7a8844f 100644 > --- a/gcc/ipa-split.c > +++ b/gcc/ipa-split.c > @@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@ execute_split_functions (void) > } > /* This can be relaxed; function might become inlinable after splitting > away the uninlinable part. */ > - if (!inline_summary (node)->inlinable) > + if (inline_edge_summary_vec && !inline_summary (node)->inlinable) .. this one. spliting is executed before free_inline_summary and thus should not be affected. Or is it because of it gets called from process_new_functions because some IPA pass adds a new function? If so, I think we need to make sure that process_new_function do not make inline summary allocated when it was previously free (and thus hunk would be OK). Honza
