Hi Paul,
well, I had those might complicated patches bit my mightily. So let's hope for
the best :-)
Thanks for the review. Committed with your proposed change in the testcase as
gcc-15-8642-ga5c69abf138
Thanks again,
Andre
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 10:40:11 +0000
Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Gosh, that's a mighty complicated patch :-) I suggest changing the comment
> in the test case:
>
> s/Check that components of procedure pointer aren't freeed./Do not free
> procedure pointer components/ or some such.
>
> OK for mainline and, I propose, 14-branch.
>
> Regards and thanks
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 09:38, Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > attached patch fixes freeing of procedure pointers that are stored in a
> > derived
> > type's component. GFortran did that already for polymorphic types but
> > missed
> > out on the others.
> >
> > Regtested ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andre
> > --
> > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> >
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
