On Sun, 16 Mar 2025, Martin Uecker wrote: > This is a workaround for another issue related to PR118765. > I do not yet understand what goes wrong in merge_decls in > this case (somehow we end up with TYPE_DECLS where > DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE is not set correctly, so we can not > determine the correct tag later), so I do not merge > these TYPE_DECLS in this specific case as a workaround > and add a "sorry" for the alignment case (or should this > simply become an error?).
I'm not convinced a workaround for something not understood is a good idea here. I think different alignment should be considered different types, so an error. -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com
